Archive

The Dulin Report

Browsable archive from the WordPress export.

Results (43)

Strategic activity mapping for software architects May 25, 2025 The future is bright Mar 30, 2025 Comparing AWS SQS, SNS, and Kinesis: A Technical Breakdown for Enterprise Developers Feb 11, 2023 Should today’s developers worry about AI code generators taking their jobs? Dec 11, 2022 Scripting languages are tools for tying APIs together, not building complex systems Jun 8, 2022 Java is no longer relevant May 29, 2022 Best practices for building a microservice architecture Apr 25, 2022 TypeScript is a productivity problem in and of itself Apr 20, 2022 In most cases, there is no need for NoSQL Apr 18, 2022 A year of COVID taught us all how to work remotely Feb 10, 2021 What programming language to use for a brand new project? Feb 18, 2020 Microsoft acquires Citus Data Jan 26, 2019 The religion of JavaScript Nov 26, 2018 Teleportation can corrupt your data Sep 29, 2018 Let’s talk cloud neutrality Sep 17, 2018 What does a Chief Software Architect do? Jun 23, 2018 TypeScript starts where JavaScript leaves off Aug 2, 2017 Node.js is a perfect enterprise application platform Jul 30, 2017 Design patterns in TypeScript: Chain of Responsibility Jul 22, 2017 Rather than innovating Walmart bullies their tech vendors to leave AWS Jun 27, 2017 TDWI 2017, Chicago, IL: Architecting Modern Big Data API Ecosystems May 30, 2017 Copyright in the 21st century or how "IT Gurus of Atlanta" plagiarized my and other's articles Mar 21, 2017 Online grocers have an additional burden to be reliable Jan 5, 2017 Don't trust your cloud service until you've read the terms Sep 27, 2016 In search for the mythical neutrality among top-tier public cloud providers Jun 18, 2016 What can we learn from the last week's salesforce.com outage ? May 15, 2016 JEE in the cloud era: building application servers Apr 22, 2016 Managed IT is not the future of the cloud Apr 9, 2016 JavaScript as the language of the cloud Feb 20, 2016 Our civilization has a single point of failure Dec 16, 2015 IT departments must transform in the face of the cloud revolution Nov 9, 2015 We Live in a Mobile Device Notification Hell Aug 22, 2015 What Every College Computer Science Freshman Should Know Aug 14, 2015 Book Review: "Shop Class As Soulcraft" By Matthew B. Crawford Jul 5, 2015 Attracting STEM Graduates to Traditional Enterprise IT Jul 4, 2015 Your IT Department's Kodak Moment Jun 17, 2015 Big Data is not all about Hadoop May 30, 2015 Smart IT Departments Own Their Business API and Take Ownership of Data Governance May 13, 2015 What can Evernote Teach Us About Enterprise App Architecture Apr 2, 2015 Microsoft and Apple Have Everything to Lose if Chromebooks Succeed Mar 31, 2015 On apprenticeship Feb 13, 2015 Wall St. wakes up to underinvestment in OMS Aug 21, 2014 Cassandra: Lessons Learned Jun 6, 2014

Design patterns in TypeScript: Chain of Responsibility

July 22, 2017

In event-driven systems messages produced by one object can be handled by one or more other objects. None of the objects need to know of one another – all they need to share is a common mechanism for distributing messages. Messages are sent from one object to another making them part of a chain. This pattern is called “Chain of Responsibility.”

Chain of responsibility in TypeScript


Node.js – and TypeScript by association – have idiomatic support for asynchronous event-driven programming. The best way to implement this pattern is by utilizing the EventEmitter class.

EventEmitter acts as a message bus. Events can be emitted or sent and can be subscribed to. Objects emitting events are independent of objects subscribing to events. This message bus needs to be a Singleton since it is shared between event publishers and event subscribers.

Source: ChainOfResponsibility.ts


import {EventEmitter} from 'events';

var messageBus=new EventEmitter();

function messageConsumer(msg:Object) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(msg));
}

messageBus.on("topic", (msg) => {
messageConsumer(msg);
});

messageBus.emit("topic", {
payload: "Hello world"
});

Case study: equities trading system backend


Events are useful constructs that represent real-world business workflows. In an equities trading system, there is typically a front-end application that allows traders to enter orders. The orders are published on a message bus, and there are multiple consumers:

  1. Order Management System (OMS) whose purpose is to capture and track orders and executions of those orders. Large orders are rarely executed all in one shot – they are typically executed as some number of smaller parts.

  2. Compliance and reporting system whose purpose is to track everything that is happening and analyze data for potential patterns of fraud.


There can be many more participants in the ecosystems – market data, reporting, etc. For this article we’ll stick to a simple simulation of OMS and compliance.

Source: HFT.ts


import {EventEmitter} from 'events';

var messageBus=new EventEmitter();

interface Order {
orderId: number,
side:"Buy"|"Sell",
symbol:string,
quantity:number
}

interface Execution {
orderId: number,
executionId: number,
symbol: string,
quantity: number,
price: number
}

class OrderManagementSystem {


constructor() {
messageBus.on("order", (orderMessage) => {
this.processOrder(orderMessage as Order);
});
messageBus.on("execution", (executionMessage) => {
this.processExecution(executionMessage as Execution);
});
}

processOrder(order:Order) {
console.log(new Date().getTime()+":OMS:order:"+JSON.stringify(order));
var numberOfExecutions=10;
var quantityPerExecution=order.quantity/numberOfExecutions;
for (var i=0;i<numberOfExecutions;i++) {
messageBus.emit("execution", {
orderId:order.orderId,
executionId: i,
symbol: order.symbol,
quantity: quantityPerExecution,
price: 101.5

});
}
}

processExecution(execution:Execution) {
console.log(new Date().getTime()+":OMS:execution:"+JSON.stringify(execution));
}
}

class ComplianceSystem {
constructor() {
messageBus.on("order", (orderMessage) => {
this.trackOrder(orderMessage as Order);
});
messageBus.on("execution", (executionMessage) => {
this.trackExecution(executionMessage as Execution);
})
}

trackOrder(order:Order) {
console.log(new Date().getTime()+":COMPLIANCE:order:"+JSON.stringify(order));
}

trackExecution(execution:Execution) {
console.log(new Date().getTime()+":COMPLIANCE:execution:"+JSON.stringify(execution));
}
}

var oms=new OrderManagementSystem();
var compliance=new ComplianceSystem();


/**
* Simulate orders coming in from the front end
**/
for (var orderId=0;orderId<10;orderId++) {
messageBus.emit("order", {
orderId: orderId,
symbol: "MSFT",
quantity: 1000,
side: "Buy"
} as Order);
}

Node events implications for concurrency and parallelism


Even though Node supports asynchronous event processing, it is important to remember that there is a single CPU thread per Node process. That means that asynchronous processing of events does not necessarily happen in parallel.

To achieve true parallel event processing, Node.js offers cluster framework. This framework supports multiple forked Node processes running on the same physical machine to operate in parallel and take advantage of multi-core CPUs.

Event processing at scale


While cluster framework helps with taking advantage of multi-core CPUs, that is often not enough. In large enterprise systems, it is not uncommon to have both event publishers and event subscribers existing independently of one another. In a cloud environment, it is also possible to auto-scale event processors based on workload requirements.

Message queues are crucial for scalable event processing. While it is beyond the scope of this article to get into the details of message queues, here are some examples: